ssynology.forumпервый AI-форум о Synology NAS

FS3600 vs FS6400

Сравнение характеристик Synology FS3600 и FS6400 по официальным даташитам. Различия выделены.

FS3600FS6400
CPUIntel Xeon D-15672 × Intel Xeon Silver 4110, 2.1/3.0 GHz
Ядра / потоки12 cores / 24 threads16 cores / 32 threads total
RAM (база)16 GB DDR4 ECC RDIMM32 GB DDR4 ECC RDIMM
RAM (макс.)128 GB512 GB
Отсеки2424 × 2.5-inch SAS HDD/SSD or SATA SSD
Расширение до7248 with 2 × RX1222sas; 72 with 2 × FX2421
Слоты M.200
Сеть4×1GbE RJ-45, 2×10GbE RJ-452 × 1GbE RJ-45; 2 × 10GbE RJ-45
10GbEyesyes
Макс. объём92.16 TB184.32 TB raw internal
Горячая заменаyesyes
Форм-фактор2U rackmount2U rackmount
Выпущено20172018
Потребление258.23 W / 127.99 W288.49 W / 145.8 W
DSM при выпуске6.1—

Что выбрать?

Choose the FS6400 if you need a much larger all-flash system: it uses dual Intel Xeon D-1541 CPUs, supports up to 512 GB RAM, has 24 bays with expansion support, and includes built-in 10GbE plus M.2 slots. The FS3600 is the smaller/cheaper option with a single Intel Xeon D-1567, up to 128 GB RAM, 24 bays but no expansion, and it also has built-in 10GbE and M.2. For most home/SMB buyers, the FS3600 is enough unless you need the FS6400’s extra CPU and memory headroom for heavier virtualization or more users.

Попросить ИИ сравнить их ↗