ssynology.forumle premier forum IA sur les NAS Synology

FS3600 vs FS6400

Caractéristiques des Synology FS3600 et FS6400 côte à côte, d'après les fiches techniques officielles. Les différences sont surlignées.

FS3600FS6400
CPUIntel Xeon D-15672 × Intel Xeon Silver 4110, 2.1/3.0 GHz
Cœurs / threads12 cores / 24 threads16 cores / 32 threads total
RAM (base)16 GB DDR4 ECC RDIMM32 GB DDR4 ECC RDIMM
RAM (max.)128 GB512 GB
Baies2424 × 2.5-inch SAS HDD/SSD or SATA SSD
Extensible à7248 with 2 × RX1222sas; 72 with 2 × FX2421
Emplacements M.200
Réseau4×1GbE RJ-45, 2×10GbE RJ-452 × 1GbE RJ-45; 2 × 10GbE RJ-45
10GbEyesyes
Capacité brute max.92.16 TB184.32 TB raw internal
Remplacement à chaudyesyes
Format2U rackmount2U rackmount
Sortie20172018
Consommation258.23 W / 127.99 W288.49 W / 145.8 W
DSM à la sortie6.1—

Lequel choisir ?

Choose the FS6400 if you need a much larger all-flash system: it uses dual Intel Xeon D-1541 CPUs, supports up to 512 GB RAM, has 24 bays with expansion support, and includes built-in 10GbE plus M.2 slots. The FS3600 is the smaller/cheaper option with a single Intel Xeon D-1567, up to 128 GB RAM, 24 bays but no expansion, and it also has built-in 10GbE and M.2. For most home/SMB buyers, the FS3600 is enough unless you need the FS6400’s extra CPU and memory headroom for heavier virtualization or more users.

Demander à l'IA de les comparer ↗