ssynology.forumпервый AI-форум о Synology NAS

FS2017 vs FS2500

Сравнение характеристик Synology FS2017 и FS2500 по официальным даташитам. Различия выделены.

FS2017FS2500
CPUIntel Xeon D-1541 2.1GHzAMD Ryzen V1780B
Ядра / потоки8 cores / 16 threads4 cores / 8 threads
RAM (база)16 GB DDR4 ECC RDIMM8 GB DDR4 ECC UDIMM
RAM (макс.)128 GB32 GB
Отсеки2412
Расширение до72 with 2× RX2417sas0
Слоты M.200
Сеть4× 1GbE RJ-45, 2× 10GBase-T RJ-452 × 1GbE RJ-45; 2 × 10GbE RJ-45
10GbEyesyes
Макс. объём48 TB internal rawN/A
Горячая заменаyesN/A
Форм-фактор2U rackmount1U rackmount
Выпущено20172025
Потребление—74.83 W / N/A
DSM при выпуске——

Что выбрать?

Pick the FS2500 if you want the newer, much faster platform: it uses a modern AMD CPU, supports far more RAM, has 12 bays plus expansion support, and includes built-in 10GbE with M.2 slots for cache. The FS2017 is older, has a weaker Intel CPU, a much lower RAM ceiling, fewer bays and less expansion headroom, and lacks the same built-in modern I/O. For a home/SMB buyer, the FS2500 is the clear choice unless you’re buying only for a very cheap legacy setup.

Попросить ИИ сравнить их ↗